<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Shack&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://charleswear.com/2008/04/25/the-shack/</link>
	<description>the publisher of Next-Wave</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 12:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://charleswear.com/2008/04/25/the-shack/#comment-175</link>
		<author>Charlie</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 21:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://charleswear.com/2008/04/25/the-shack/#comment-175</guid>
		<description>It seems that God's idea of hierarchy is different than man's. A hierarchy of servanthood?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that God&#8217;s idea of hierarchy is different than man&#8217;s. A hierarchy of servanthood?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://charleswear.com/2008/04/25/the-shack/#comment-174</link>
		<author>Scott</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://charleswear.com/2008/04/25/the-shack/#comment-174</guid>
		<description>I haven't read it yet - I'm eager to though.  I was a little surprised by Driscoll's comments.  Every other criticism of the book I could see coming simply based on the source, but I didn't see that one coming from him.  Having read it and enjoyed it - what did you think about his comments regarding the problem of hierarchy?  The other two objections I just blow off, but I wonder what your position on that one is.

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t read it yet - I&#8217;m eager to though.  I was a little surprised by Driscoll&#8217;s comments.  Every other criticism of the book I could see coming simply based on the source, but I didn&#8217;t see that one coming from him.  Having read it and enjoyed it - what did you think about his comments regarding the problem of hierarchy?  The other two objections I just blow off, but I wonder what your position on that one is.</p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Preston P</title>
		<link>http://charleswear.com/2008/04/25/the-shack/#comment-173</link>
		<author>Preston P</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://charleswear.com/2008/04/25/the-shack/#comment-173</guid>
		<description>I agree, a remarkable book.  I wept about my own great sadness and about the surprising love of God - blended together in the same drops.  I am frustrated by those who can't see the book for what it is.  On Youtube you said, "Too frequently people try to take one person's wrestling with difficult thoughts and make them into something they aren't. Driscoll did that here. Clearly the Holy Spirit is not a dove and God is not an old man. But to assert that we should not use word pictures to describe the undescribable is pitifully shallow, in my opinion. "  I couldn't agree more!  Thanks for posting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, a remarkable book.  I wept about my own great sadness and about the surprising love of God - blended together in the same drops.  I am frustrated by those who can&#8217;t see the book for what it is.  On Youtube you said, &#8220;Too frequently people try to take one person&#8217;s wrestling with difficult thoughts and make them into something they aren&#8217;t. Driscoll did that here. Clearly the Holy Spirit is not a dove and God is not an old man. But to assert that we should not use word pictures to describe the undescribable is pitifully shallow, in my opinion. &#8221;  I couldn&#8217;t agree more!  Thanks for posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
